The man looks in the movement for change and novelty, being the static reactionary stands for continuity.
In art, the movement was an expression. So it was in painting, sculpture, architecture ... Then came the facilities to museums and exhibitions, in which "artists" are licensed to frame defects in their creativity, or as in the so-called dynamic architecture with buildings with movement, which provides architectural mediocrity of movement, if only in one dimension. This is the big news, especially the great feeling of movement in buildings. What would Vladimir Tatlin, with its monument to the Third International to their backs, the Twirling Tower of David Fisher, heralded as revolutionary? Two very different ways of understanding the movement.
a personal level, the movement is very fashionable. In Spain, we moved only to go to Benidorm, we have now been convinced that the cross-border tourism is cool. Where are you Pepe! Honestly, the movement is a flight. Man flees traveling, rather than discover, you lose. Nothing like a passport full of visas to diagnose a syndrome of Ulises invested (which put stress put pleasure / satisfaction). Recurrent migration understood as leisure / means of escape. Very century.
Well, in short, I think I understood as a dynamic movement is symptomatic of lack. The movement should be an expression. Everyone who apply it as you can. PD
There is no better proof of this I say dance stuck in a chair in the cultural center of Galileo Moving on Femme Fatale . Pure expression of movement. Indeed Femme, your next album looks like it's going to be best in a long time.
